Tennessee case abstract on divorce.
Rania Anwar Al Qaisi v. Diab Mahmoud Alia
The husband on this Davidson County, Tennessee, case was born and raised in Kuwait and had a level in mechanical engineering. After changing into a U.S. citizen, he attended a commerce college to change into an authorized mechanic. On the age of 42, he married in Jordan, when the spouse was 27 years outdated. She had labored as an inside designer in Jordan, however didn’t work in the USA. That they had a daughter in 2015.
The husband operated a enterprise shopping for and promoting automobiles, however the enterprise proved to be unprofitable. When he was provided a job as supervisor of a mobile phone firm retailer, the couple moved to North Carolina. The wedding stored deteriorating, and in 2018, the husband was transferred to Nashville. After a home dispute, the spouse went to the police and obtained an order of safety, and the husband was arrested. Shortly thereafter, the spouse filed for divorce.
Whereas the case was pending, the spouse filed a movement for contempt, alleging that the husband had transferred $262,000 to a overseas account. The husband was present in contempt, however for the reason that sister to whom he transferred the cash refused to return it, there was no means for the husband to purge the contempt.
A trial was held, and in early 2020, the courtroom entered its closing decree. The trial choose discovered that the husband was “vulnerable to excessive exaggerations” and was not a reputable witness.
After finding out the testimony, the trial courtroom named the spouse as the first residential guardian and gave her 246 days of parenting time, with the husband having 119 days.
The spouse was making about $2150 per thirty days at a restaurant and driving for Uber. The husband claimed to be making $300 per week, however the trial courtroom discovered that the husband offered inadequate proof of his earnings, a lot of which have been money. The courtroom discovered him to be voluntarily underemployed and pegged his revenue at over $37,000. It subsequently set his youngster assist obligation at $488 per thirty days.
The trial courtroom took the $262,000 switch under consideration when making the property settlement and alimony awards. The alimony award was set at $1,070 per thirty days, and the spouse was awarded legal professional charges. The husband then appealed to the Tennessee Court docket of Appeals.
The appeals courtroom first regarded on the imputed revenue of the husband and agreed that the trial courtroom had taken the right strategy. It agreed with the decrease courtroom that the husband had not correctly documented his earnings and that he was voluntarily underemployed. In distinction, it regarded on the spouse’s earnings in a restaurant, as an Uber driver, and as a supply driver for Amazon.
The husband argued that the alimony quantity had been set too excessive, however as soon as once more, the appeals courtroom agreed with the decrease courtroom. The husband offered a chart of his bills to the appeals courtroom, however the courtroom famous that these quantities weren’t correctly within the trial document. The appeals courtroom referred to as this a “belated try and piece collectively proof that he ought to have confirmed at trial” and rejected it. After reviewing the proof, the courtroom affirmed the alimony award.
Lastly, the courtroom regarded on the parenting time and agreed that the decrease courtroom had acted appropriately.
For these causes, the Court docket of Appeals affirmed, and taxed the prices of attraction towards the husband.
No. M2020-00390-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Jan. 28, 2021).
See unique opinion for precise language. Authorized citations omitted.
To be taught extra, see Property Division in Tennessee Divorce.
